Re: Index is beyond end of object; Method parse/execution failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:02 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 September 2009 01:32:27 pm Simon Kitching wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 10:31 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Simon Kitching<skitching@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Suspend-to-mem and resume seem to work fine, but I get a few odd ACPI
> > > > messages in dmesg. Is this of interest to anyone?
> > > >
> > > > [  188.914261] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (000000005)
> > > > is beyond end of object 20090521 exoparg2-445
> > > > [  188.914278] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
> > > > [\_SB_.C248] (Node f701a6d8), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
> > > > [  188.914344] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
> > > > [\_SB_.C002.C0DE.C354._STM] (Node f701d780), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
> > > > [  188.914415] ata5: ACPI set timing mode failed (status=0x300b)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kernel: 2.6.31-rc9
> > > > Distro: ubuntu 09.04
> > > > Hardware: Compaq nc8430 laptop
> > > > CPU: core duo T2500
> > > >
> > > > These messages are generated every time I run
> > > >   echo "mem" > /sys/power/state
> > > > although otherwise the suspend/resume seems 100% ok.
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to provide more info or run tests if anyone wants me to.
> > > 
> > > Could you attach the acpidump output?
> > 
> > Rather than send a 300kb attachment, I have put the relevant file here:
> >   http://people.apache.org/~skitching/acpidump.txt
> 
> I think this is a BIOS defect.  Frans Pop reported the same
> problem earlier on a Compaq 2510p.  I poked our notebook BIOS
> people about it, but since these are fairly old notebooks and
> we haven't seen any real problem (other than the error messages),
> there's not much interest in fixing it.  Sorry; I wish I had a
> better answer.
> 

Well, if this is due to a defective BIOS, then not much can be done;
there certainly isn't much point in releasing new BIOS versions for
3-year-old systems. I posted mainly because it might indicate a Linux
ACPI implementation bug that could be fixed.

Hopefully in future BIOS makers will try boot/suspend/resume tests with
Linux before shipping :-)

Thanks to you all.

Regards, Simon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux