Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal: sysfs-api.txt - document passive attribute for thermal zones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > We should not involve any platform specific stuff in this
> > > documentation. how about "Attribute is only present for zones in which
> > > the passive cooling policy is not supported by native thermal driver"
> > [...]
> > > > -If the processor is listed in _PSL method, and the fan is listed in
> > > > _AL0 -method, the sys I/F structure will be built like this:
> > > > +If the processor is listed in _PSL method, the fan is listed in _AL0
> > > > +method, and the zone has a _PSV method, the sys I/F structure will
> > > > be +built like this:
> > >
> > > For an ACPI thermal zone, supporting passive cooling means that both
> > > _PSL and _PSV are available.
> > > so I don't think we need to change this. :)
> > 
> > OK. Updated patch below.
> > 
> > 
> > From: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: thermal: sysfs-api.txt - document passive attribute for thermal zones
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> thanks,
> rui
> > diff --git a/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt b/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
> > index 895337f..a87dc27 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
> > @@ -199,6 +199,15 @@ cdev[0-*]_trip_point
> >  	point.
> >  	RO, Optional
> >  
> > +passive
> > +	Attribute is only present for zones in which the passive cooling
> > +	policy is not supported by native thermal driver. Default is zero
> > +	and can be set to a temperature (in millidegrees) to enable a
> > +	passive trip point for the zone. Activation is done by polling
> > +	with an interval of 1 second.
> > +	Unit: millidegrees Celsius
> > +	RW, Optional
> > +

So '0=disabled'? Better say that, because throttling at 0C would be
useless in most of the world.

Are values below zero supported? Maybe -28000mC should mean
'disabled'? :-).

									Pavel 

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux