Oh, and cc linux-acpi.... On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 02:53 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 15:48 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > <joke> > > This should be brought to a Microsoft antitrust case... > > </joke> > > > > > > Today many notebooks ship with a embedded infrared receiver. > > In Vista there is new subsystem that decodes these signals. > > (of course it works only with Microsoft Certificated Remotes (TM)...) > > > > The receiver is usually presented to system as a pnp device > > (using acpi tables) > > > > It turns out that some bioses actually use the OSI, ACPI feature of the > > operation system to detect if running inside Vista. If not they disable > > the infrared receiver. > > > > Device (MIR) > > { > > Name (_HID, EisaId ("ENE0100")) > > Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) > > { > > If (LAnd (MCIR, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6))) > > { > > Return (0x0F) > > } > > Else > > { > > Store (Zero, ^^LPCB.IOR2) > > Return (Zero) > > } > > } > > > > ....... > > > > > Scope (_SB) > > { > > Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized) > > { > .... > > > If (CondRefOf (_OSI, Local0)) > > { > > If (_OSI ("Linux")) > > { > > Store (One, LINX) > > Store (Zero, ECDY) > > } > > .......... > > > > > If (_OSI ("Windows 2006")) > > { > > Store (0x07D6, OSYS) > > } > ....... > > > I have finally managed to find root case of this problem. > > Indeed the _STA method of infrared receiver is called before the _INI of > _SB. > > The problem lies in acpi_bus_init() > /* > * ACPI 2.0 requires the EC driver to be loaded and work before > * the EC device is found in the namespace (i.e. before acpi_initialize_objects() > * is called). > * > * This is accomplished by looking for the ECDT table, and getting > * the EC parameters out of that. > */ > > status = acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(); > /* Ignore result. Not having an ECDT is not fatal. */ > > status = acpi_initialize_objects(ACPI_FULL_INITIALIZATION); > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unable to initialize ACPI objects\n"); > goto error1; > } > ....... > > > on Mairo's system (just as well as on mine) there is no ECDT. > Thus, acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() triggers a acpi namespace walk, > which in turn triggers invocation on _STA (which is supposed to be > harmless, but the <beep>, the bios developers produce doesn't seem to > meet this criteria....). > > And this is done before running _INI methods, which are run just later, > in acpi_initialize_objects. > > I suspect that many systems use _SB._INI to test the OS version, thus > this behavior needs to be revised. > > The fact that this (as usual) works in windows suggest that it might be > good to look up the ECDT table before acpi_initialize_objects, but if > not found, look up the EC later. > > On my system, although I have tried to reproduce this bug, I couldn't, > and I know now why: It just so happens that on my system CIR device is > listed in acpi tables after the EC, but on Mairo's system EC is just > first device. > > Maybe we can add a 'walk only' function, that walks the namespace, but > doesn't touch the _STA, and use it to find the EC there? > > Looking for comments, > Best regards, > Maxim Levitsky > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html