Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: Bind the Linux device tree to the ACPI device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:54:31AM +0200, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
> Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't it be more natural to write this as
> 
>         if (sata_pmp_attached(ap))
>                 adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, dev->link->pmp);
>         else
>                 adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, NO_PORT_MULT);

Heh, yes. That would also work.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux