On Saturday 01 August 2009, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009 06:59:59 pm Zhang Rui wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 05:54 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On some machines, a software-initiated SMI causes corruption unless the > > > SMI runs on CPU 0. An SMI can be initiated by any AML, but typically it's > > > done in GPE-related methods that are run via workqueues, so we can avoid > > > the known corruption cases by binding the workqueues to CPU 0. > > > > > > References: > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751 > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157171 > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157691 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > In addition to the reports above, I think it's likely this patch > will fix the problems reported below: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13412 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12328 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12106 > > I think we should consider this patch for 2.6.31. > > (Rafael, 13751 is on your "2.6.29 -> 2.6.30" regression list. > I actually think it's been around much longer than that, but > there seem to be many things that affect whether it manifests.) I've dropped it from the list, thanks. Best, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
