> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 10:13:49 pm Len Brown wrote: > > From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > "sfi=off" is analogous to "acpi=off" > > > > In practice, "sfi=off" isn't likely to be very useful, for > > 1. SFI is used only when ACPI is not available > > 2. Today's SFI systems are not legacy PC-compatible > > > > ie. "sfi=off" on an ACPI-platform is a NO-OP, > > and "sfi=off" on an SFI-platform will likely result in boot failure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > I think the documentation update should be part of the patch > that changes the functionality, so the doc always matches the > code. True. I was somewhat lazy when i generated this patch series from as single patch, and split mainly in groups of files. Re: sfi=off I'm actually going to delete this one -- perhaps adding it later when/if it does something useful. thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
