* Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:03:05 -0600 > Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > We cannot simply call acpi_get_pci_dev() on any random ACPI handle > > and hope that it works, because a PCI root bridge may not have > > an associated struct pci_dev. > > > > This is allowed per the PCI specification, and is referred to as a > > non-materialized bridge. > > > > So, depending on the type of PCI bridge that the handle points to, > > use the appropriate interface to return the struct pci_bus correctly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> > > --- > > I put these in my linux-next branch, just because I'm really > conservative about the current release. > > If we hear of boxes in the wild getting bitten by the non-materialized > bit, we can push this set back to stable. Sounds good, thanks Jesse. /ac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
