Re: [Patch] CPUFREQ: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:37:43AM +0800, ykzhao wrote:
 > Subject: [CPUFREQ]: Add the suspend/resume flag to avoid smp_call in cpufreq_suspend/resume 
 > From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
 > 
 > Only CPU0 is available in course of cpufreq_suspend/resume.
 > So it is unnecessary to do the smp_call for getting the current
 > cpufreq.
 > 
 > Add a flag of suspend/resume to avoid the smp_call in course of
 > cpufreq_suspend/resume.
 > 
 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781
 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13269
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
 > Tested-by: Christian Casteyde<casteyde.christian@xxxxxxx>

All this goes away if we just made that suspend/resume code
conditional on powerpc as previously discussed.

We don't need any of it on x86 afaict

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux