On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:46:14AM +0800, ykzhao wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 22:00 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > It's being accessed via ACPI methods, so the vendors have the > > opportunity to implement proper locking. > If the vendors can implement the proper locking, there will be no > conflict. I assume that the spec requires it. > Another issue is that this driver had better be put in the directory of > driver/platform/x86/. I don't see anything x86-specific about it. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
