2009/6/13 Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/6/11 yakui_zhao <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> + if (acpi_disabled) {
>> + /*
>> + * if ACPI is disabled, there is no ACPI device tree. And
>> + * we don't know whether there exists the LID device.
>> + * In such case we will return 0.
>> + */
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> Won't this prevent people from debugging ACPI problems on laptops by
> disabling ACPI on the kernel command line? Does this patch mean that,
> in such case, there will be no output at all? Maybe, without ACPI, we
> should initialize LVDS if and only if there are no other output
> devices connected?
Oops, I misread the code. If ACPI is disabled, we return 0, not
-ENODEV. That's right.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
