On Sunday 31 May 2009 04:31:51 yakui_zhao wrote:
> + /*
> + * On some boxes several processors use the same processor bus id.
> + * But they are located in different scope. For example:
> + * \_SB.SCK0.CPU0
> + * \_SB.SCK1.CPU0
> + * Rename the processor device bus id. And the new bus id will be
> + * generated as the following format:
> + * CPU+CPU ID.
> + */
> + sprintf(acpi_device_bid(device), "CPU%X", pr->id);
Hm, there were several attempts to get rid of acpi_device_bid and
friends.
Especially here, sprintfing into something function like looks really
wrong.
Len, do you agree that not introducing new ones and at some point of
time replacing:
acpi_device_bid(device)
with
device->pnp.bus_id
is the way to go?
Thanks,
Thomas
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Processor [%d:%d]\n", pr->id,
> pr->acpi_id));
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
