From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
When BIOS SETUP is changed to disable EIST, some BIOS
hand the OS an un-initialized _PSS:
Name (_PSS, Package (0x06)
{
Package (0x06)
{
0x80000000, // frequency [MHz]
0x80000000, // power [mW]
0x80000000, // latency [us]
0x80000000, // BM latency [us]
0x80000000, // control
0x80000000 // status
},
...
These are outrageous values for frequency,
power and latency, raising the question where to draw
the line between legal and illegal. We tend to survive
garbage in the power and latency fields, but we can BUG_ON
when garbage is in the frequency field.
Cpufreq multiplies the frequency by 1000 and stores it in a u32 KHz.
So disregard a _PSS with a frequency so large
that it can't be represented by cpufreq.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500311
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index cafb410..60e543d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -309,9 +309,15 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
(u32) px->bus_master_latency,
(u32) px->control, (u32) px->status));
- if (!px->core_frequency) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
- "Invalid _PSS data: freq is zero\n");
+ /*
+ * Check that ACPI's u64 MHz will be valid as u32 KHz in cpufreq
+ */
+ if (!px->core_frequency ||
+ ((u32)(px->core_frequency * 1000) !=
+ (px->core_frequency * 1000))) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR FW_BUG PREFIX
+ "Invalid BIOS _PSS frequency: 0x%llx MHz\n",
+ px->core_frequency);
result = -EFAULT;
kfree(pr->performance->states);
goto end;
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
