Hi Alan: Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > That's okay. Inelegant, perhaps, but workable. Besides, as we see > below, the new rule would have to do more than the old rule. > > I agree this is a rather inelegant solution. A new rule would have to be added to hid2hci then. It's much more preferable to be able to fix kernel space from mucking up the device. Is there a way to mark a device to /not/ run reset-resume after S3? > > Does that create the same removal event? If it does then you wouldd be > in an unfortunate state. The script would have to check somehow > whether the removal was deliberate or spontaneous. > Yes it does create the same removal event when you switch to HID mode. I don't know of any way that you can calculate if the switch was intentional. -- Mario Limonciello *Dell | Linux Engineering* mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
