On dim, 2009-05-17 at 01:06 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Currently, sysfs interface repeats brokenness of /proc/acpi/battery > interface. Hmmh, ok, but it seems to have change recently (since powertop and acpitools are definitely wrong when it comes to that) […] > The proper way to handle it is to check for 'energy_now' and if it is > present, look for 'power_now'. It should be > present in 2.6.30 and later kernels (remaining time > energy_now/power_now). If it is not present (as in 2.6.29), then you > should assume that 'current_now' has value in uW, and remaining time > is energy_now/current_now. > If you have 'charge_now', remaining time is charge_now/current_now > without any complications. Wow. Thanks for the info, that's definitely not really easily guessable :) It'd be nice to have that documented somewhere until things settle down a bit and the situation becomes unbroken. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
