On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 23:21 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 11 May 2009, yakui_zhao wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 04:48 +0800, Witold Szczeponik wrote: > > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh schrieb: > > > > > > > On Fri, 08 May 2009, Len Brown wrote: > > > >> Or perhaps we should just shrug off the _PS3 failure > > > >> and carry on with _DIS like we used to -- which is > > > >> what this patch does. > > > > > > > > Maybe "printk and carry on" would be better? > > > > > > > > > > And there is very similar code just a few lines above: where we turn on > > > the device by setting it to D0. There, too, we may want to skip the > > > check whether or not the transition was successful or not. > > What you said is right. > > It sounds reasonable that we skip the power state check while transiting > > it to D0 state. > > > > In fact the power state check can be skipped by adding the boot option > > of "acpi.power_nocheck=1". > > Can we avoid adding the boot option? I'd very much prefer not to add boot > options if not really necessary. One is to add it into the DMI power check table so that the default value of power_nocheck is 1. Another is that the default value of power_nocheck is changed to 1 instead of 0. In such case the power state check will be skipped in course of power transition. Is this OK? > > Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
