* Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 20 April 2009 12:45:29 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote: > > > > FYI, > > > > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-) > > > Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60. > > > I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function > > > at all. > > > > > > > and so i put the DSDT here: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139 > > > > > > > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon... > > > Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please. > > > This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes > > > as it seem to implement some corner case. > > > > Sure, find it attached below. > > > > Ingo > > > > DSDT @ 0x7f6e65e7 > > 0000: 44 53 44 54 65 c7 00 00 01 49 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f > ... > Ingo, did you do a BIOS update in between? > The DSDT and SSDTs you added do not contain a _PPC function. > These ACPI tables definitely do not suffer from an initial _PPC > evaluation. no, i didnt update anything. I only touch the BIOS if i absolutely have to. Was the original analysis wrong then? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
