On Friday 24 April 2009, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for > > which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them > > have been fixed already, please let me know. > > > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please > > let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let > > me know if any of the entries below are invalid. > > > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to > > this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the > > issue. > > > > [...] > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13067 > > Subject : iwl3945: wlan0: beacon loss from AP - sending probe request > > Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2009-04-05 9:11 (12 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123892272218266&w=4 > > The regression here is that I added a printk() to inform about beacon > loss. The issue has been there a long time, the printk() just exposed > it. > > Michael wrote a patch which silences the printk: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=commit;h=16eaea5faa37d552b14e246ca56a436e55ca67b3 > > I fixed the beacon loss detection here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=commit;h=3b6dc5a431e4fef35717cba53544a95209f49b68 > > John, I think Michael's patch should be sent to 2.6.30. Any chances > for that? > > Rafael, is it possible to send your regression mails to > linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as well? Very few wireless developers > have time to follow netdev or lkml. Sure, the next reports will go there too. Best, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
