* Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ingo, > Thanks for the reply. > > But please disregard that patch -- we've cooked up a better one > that allows ICH4M to continue to use hpet=force, even for clocksource. > (and it is an ACPI patch rather than an x86 patch:-) ok. > However, I'll also send a 2nd patch to stop soliciting more > hpet=force users, since technically we shouldn't be encouraging > the use of this un-documented and lightly-validated hardware. agreed - i've applied this patch. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
