Sorry about the noise, by brain was stopped when I sent the last mail, please ignore the From address, it is wrong! On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (cc linux-acpi) > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:56:12 +0100 "Tiago Sim__es Batista" > <tiagosbatista@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Yesterday, I recompiled my kernel (git + tuxonice) > > v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91, there were a couple of issues, the main > > one is ilustrated bellow. > > > > I am not familiar with the kernel code, but if you give me some > > pointers, I will be glad to investigate this further > > > > $time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp > > 34000 > > > > real 0m6.613s > > user 0m0.000s > > sys 0m0.001s > > > > Is this a regression? Was 2.6.29 OK? > > Thanks. My last kernel was fine: $ time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp 48000 real 0m0.007s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.007s I also forgot to add some information about my kernels... The good one is 2.6.29 + tuxonice as it was the day after the 2.6.29 kernel was released. The bad one is a pull from linus tree on april the 9th plus tuxonice on the same day from git (hope this helps): $ git describe v2.6.29-tiago2-ice v2.6.29-836-g00492ed $ git describe v2.6.30-rc1-tiago1-ice v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91 If tuxonice is a suspect, I will be glad to remove it and recompile. If I have the time later this weekend, and nothing was found, I will try to bisect this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
