On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13018 >> Subject : 2.6.29 on MacBook 2,1 fails to reboot >> Submitter : Trenton Adams <trenton.d.adams@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date : 2009-03-30 2:04 (8 days old) >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123837870307249&w=4 >> Handled-By : "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This went through bisection, but looking at the email log, I tend to > suspect that maybe Trenton marked some versions good even though they > weren't (because they got versions numbers from v2.6.27), and didn't > realize that that messes up bisection in a big way. Is it appropriate for me to respond to these things? I was wondering about that. Someone had mentioned that I should trust the bisect, even when it takes me into "other versions", and it was taking me through 2.6.27, which I thought was just really weird. Would you like me to try the bisect again with a little more diligence, or do you think it can be found with the info given? It may take a week or so, due to being a bit busy. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
