On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 05:41:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Matthias Welwarsky wrote:
>
> > Whoops, just noticed that there was a bug in my patch. No wonder it confused
> > you. Should untranslated events >= 0x90 still generate ACPI events? In that
> > case, the following patch would fix it. If not, the acpi event reporting must
> > be moved into the else path, too.
>
> I don't think it's likely to be useful - if we ever implement support
> for them then we'll generate different events and generate user
> confusion.
yes, but up to 2.6.29 they are being reported for all the models
supported by the former SNC initialization code. I'd rather keep them
until /proc/acpi/event goes away.
> > --- sony-laptop.c.orig 2009-03-29 12:41:44.000000000 +0200
> > +++ sony-laptop.c 2009-03-29 18:36:31.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@
> > static struct sony_nc_event sony_100_events[] = {
> > { 0x90, SONYPI_EVENT_PKEY_P1 },
> > { 0x10, SONYPI_EVENT_ANYBUTTON_RELEASED },
> > - { 0x91, SONYPI_EVENT_PKEY_P1 },
> > + { 0x91, SONYPI_EVENT_PKEY_P2 },
> > { 0x11, SONYPI_EVENT_ANYBUTTON_RELEASED },
> > { 0x81, SONYPI_EVENT_FNKEY_F1 },
> > { 0x01, SONYPI_EVENT_FNKEY_RELEASED },
> > @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@
> > if (sony_find_snc_handle(0x127) == ev)
> > key_handle = 0x127;
> >
> > - if (handle) {
> > + if (key_handle) {
> > struct sony_nc_event *key_event;
> >
> > if (sony_call_snc_handle(key_handle, 0x200, &result))
> > @@ -955,15 +955,16 @@
> > printk(KERN_INFO DRV_PFX
> > "Unknown event: 0x%x 0x%x\n", key_handle,
> > ev);
> > - }
> > + } else
> > + sony_laptop_report_input_event(ev);
> > } else if (sony_find_snc_handle(0x124) == ev) {
> > sony_nc_rfkill_update();
> > return;
> > }
> > - }
> > + } else
> > + sony_laptop_report_input_event(ev);
> >
> > dprintk("sony_acpi_notify, event: 0x%.2x\n", ev);
> > - sony_laptop_report_input_event(ev);
> > acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(sony_nc_acpi_device, 1, ev);
> > }
>
> Yes, that looks good, just move the acpi_bus_generate_proc_event into
> the same blocks as sony_laptop_report_input_event.
>
> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'll take this version of the patch.
Len, this patch isn't upstream yet, would you prefer me to resend
only this one with the fixes from Matthias merged in or do you want it
as a separate fix?
Also, Matthias can we have your signoff line?
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
