On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > When cpufreq driver call acpi_processor_preregister_performance() , function > will clean up pr->performance even if there is possibly already registered > other cpufreq driver. The patch fix this potential problem. It also remove > double checks in P domain basic validity code and move these checks to function > where _PSD data is captured. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > What failure symptom does the user see before this patch is applied? Does it merit backporting to .stable? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
