Re: [PATCH 06/10] ACPI: call acpi_debug_init() explicitly rather than as initcall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 24 March 2009 05:08:12 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_debug_init() directly.
> > Previously, both were subsys_initcalls.  acpi_debug_init()
> > must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
> > explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/bus.c      |    1 +
> >  drivers/acpi/debug.c    |   14 ++++++--------
> >  drivers/acpi/internal.h |    6 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > index c133072..f32cfd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > @@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
> >        acpi_ec_init();
> >        acpi_power_init();
> >        acpi_system_init();
> > +       acpi_debug_init();
> >        return result;
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/debug.c b/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > index 20223cb..9cb189f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > @@ -297,17 +297,15 @@ acpi_system_write_debug(struct file *file,
> >
> >        return count;
> >  }
> > +#endif
> >
> > -static int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> > +int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> >  {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS
> >        struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> >        int error = 0;
> >        char *name;
> >
> > -
> > -       if (acpi_disabled)
> > -               return 0;
> > -
> >        /* 'debug_layer' [R/W] */
> >        name = ACPI_SYSTEM_FILE_DEBUG_LAYER;
> >        entry =
> > @@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ static int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> >        remove_proc_entry(ACPI_SYSTEM_FILE_DEBUG_LAYER, acpi_root_dir);
> >        error = -ENODEV;
> >        goto Done;
> > -}
> > -
> > -subsys_initcall(acpi_debug_init);
> > +#else
> > +       return 0;
> >  #endif
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > index 4a35f6e..44b8402 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,12 @@
> >  int acpi_scan_init(void);
> >  int acpi_system_init(void);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG
> 
> ==> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS)

I could do that, and leave the #ifdefs in debug.c as they were,
but I thought it was cleaner to make it so that if we compile debug.c
(i.e., CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y), it always provides acpi_debug_init().

I moved the #ifdefs in debug.c so that acpi_debug_init() is a no-op
if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=n.

So I think my patch already addressed your concern, but let me
know if not.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux