On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:10:30AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:46:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Ok, sounds like the mapping needs to be changed. Can you let me know > > which ACPI events are generated for each key? > > Yes it does. > A vaio SR user sent me this list for 0x9c that after a call to SN07(202) > becomes: 0x9c as well? Interesting. Easy enough to generalise that code, I guess. If we don't have a match, maybe we should just send the scancode with KEY_UNKNOWN and let hal remap them? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
