Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, why don't you implement the platform suspend operations for Xen?
I guess you don't want ACPI _PTS to be executed during suspend as well.

I don't know.  What's _PTS?

I think for the most part we want Linux to do most of the acpi work of bringing the machine into an idle state. Its just that Xen is responsible for the very low level cpu context save/restore, because the Linux kernel is still running on vcpus rather than the physical cpus.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux