On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:24:23AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:08:47PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > - some models have different magic numbers for the _DSM invocation, from > > the DSDT I have available: > > DSDT.sz.xxx.dsl (some uknown model) > > DSDT.sz61mn-forXP.dsl > > DSDT.tt11lnb.dsl > > DSDT.z11vn.dsl > > DSDT.z90s.dsl > > VGN-SZ4XWNC-R0111N0.dsl > > and for what I can see, z and tt have the same magic numbers while the > > sz has different ones. So the code that calls _DSM will need to have > > some DMI switch to make sure we are calling it with the right > > parameters (for now supporting z and tt might be enough) > > _DSM is "Device Specific Method". The magic numbers it requires are > interface descriptions. How many of these machines have nvidia-based > dual GPU architectures? SZ and Z have dual GPUs (Intel onboard + NVidia), TT doesn't. > Are the _DSM methods always attached to the > nvidia device? As far as I can see the Z is the only one having it attached to the nvidia device. You can have a look at the DSDTs here: http://www.kamineko.org/dsdt-vaio/ -- mattia :wq! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
