On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:31:36AM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > What about systems that have clear indication of STR and STD on respective > keys? Should they continue to return KEY_SLEEP for STR? I think this > conflicts with definition above. So in the long run those should be changed to > return KEY_SUSPEND2RAM it seems. Perhaps, but at present they KEY_SLEEP is probably adequate. KEY_SLEEP is always going to default to suspend to RAM, so really the only distinction between it and a dedicated suspend to RAM key is whether a UI element affects its behaviour or not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
