On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 09:40 +0800, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > PING... > > This is a cosmetic fix, but it still avoids random binary crap leaking > into debug messages, for the price of an obvious 3-char change. > > Can I get an ACK for it, please? I'd like to see this go into > 2.6.28.y... Looks good. Ack-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > acpi_ut_get_node_name() returns a four char fixed-size array, not > > NULL-terminated. > > > > This issue was fixed indirectly in mainline by commit > > 60a4ce7f4148155d3f28eea4a213f7ee47cd57b7. > > > > This is the minimal fix for stable 2.6.28. > > > > Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/power.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c > > index bb7d50d..ad55db1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c > > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int acpi_power_get_state(acpi_handle handle, int *state) > > *state = (sta & 0x01)?ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON: > > ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_OFF; > > > > - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Resource [%s] is %s\n", > > + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Resource [%4.4s] is %s\n", > > acpi_ut_get_node_name(handle), > > *state ? "on" : "off")); > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
