On Tuesday 24 February 2009 12:06:07 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Saturday 21 February 2009 09:28:31 pm Len Brown wrote: > > I like this patch, but not wild about the name "pci.h" > > > > there are already about 20 pci.h files in the tree. > > sure, they are context specific, but still i don't like it. > > > > (and I don't like having 11 acpi.h files in the tree either...) > > > > how about acpi_pci.h? > > > > yeah, i know it would be redundant, as it lives in drivers/acpi/ > > but as basically everything it the file starts with "acpi_pci..." > > maybe a little redundancy can be seen as consistent? > > Personally, I *like* the fact that we have a hierarchy where the > context provides useful information. P.S. My opinion here might be influenced by the fact that I always use "cscope -p4". Cscope users who use the default (show only one path component) would benefit a lot more from having redundant information in the filename. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
