Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:

 year (I think the info is available, right?) We could
default to strict for systems with year >= 2009. This may still prevent
users from getting the best out of their system, but at least won't
cause a regression for users of older systems where the native driver
has been used so far. I know it's not an ideal solution, but ACPI
implementations aren't ideal either.

The problem with this approach is that we still end up with a large number of malfunctioning machines. Really, I don't think there's any way to handle this other than defaulting to strict, letting the default be changed at run and boot time and printing a message when a driver is refused permission to bind. Distributions that want to obtain the previous behaviour can change the default back.


For the record we have changed the default to strict in Fedora's development branch, for 2 weeks or so now, including in the recently released Fedora 11 release and we've had 0 complaints so far.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux