Hi Kenji-san,
Sorry, I didn't read your patch in detail last time, and only saw
the one wording change that Andrew suggested.
Reading through now, I have a few more suggestions.
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return status;
> +
> + if (!output.length)
> + return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> +
> + out_obj = output.pointer;
> + if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Evaluate _OSC returns wrong type\n");
"_OSC evaluation returned wrong type\n"
> + if (errors) {
> + if (errors & OSC_REQUEST_ERROR)
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC request fails\n");
"_OSC request failed\n"
> + if (errors & OSC_INVALID_UUID_ERROR)
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC invalid UUID\n");
> + if (errors & OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR)
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC invalid revision\n");
> + if (errors & OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR) {
> + if (capbuf[OSC_QUERY_TYPE] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE)
> + goto out_success;
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG"Firmware did not grant requested "
> + "_OSC control\n");
I prefer to see this message on one line (and break the 80 column
rule) to make grepping easier. But this is a judgement call, and
I'll let you decide.
Thanks.
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
