Il Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Thomas Renninger ha scritto:
> On Monday 02 February 2009 12:38:24 you wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:22:43 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > >> @@ -1063,7 +1063,10 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on",
> > >> acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup); * in arbitrary AML code and can
> > >> interfere with legacy drivers. * acpi_enforce_resources= can be set to:
> > >> *
> > >> - * - strict (2)
> > >> + * - auto (2)
> > >> + * -> detect possible conflicts with ACPI drivers and switch to
> > >> + * strict if needed, otherwise act like lax
> > >> + * - strict (3)
> > >> * -> further driver trying to access the resources will not load
> > >> * - lax (default) (1)
> > >> * -> further driver trying to access the resources will load, but
> > >> you @@ -1073,11 +1076,12 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on",
> > >> acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup); * -> ACPI Operation Region
> > >> resources will not be registered *
> > >> */
> > >> -#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 2
> > >> +#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 3
> > >> +#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO 2
> > >> #define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX 1
> > >> #define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_NO 0
> > >
> > > I don't see any reason to change ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT from 2 to 3.
> > > Just add ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO as 3 and that's it, makes your patch
> > > smaller.
> >
> > There's an unspoken reason ;-) The options are ordered by
> > "strictness", I was experimenting with an API to export the parameter,
> > in order to move the code to a separate quirk file. Since it's not
> > relevant in this patch I'll back out the change.
>
> And the other one, implementing the ATK0110 quirk.
> The same probably could be easy done now with video_detect.c.
> The video device HID should get added in scan.c again as suggested by Bjorn.
> Then the video_detect.c can go into quirks.c and get deleted.
>
> What do you think?
Well mostly ACK, modulo DMI comment in my other email.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 6729a49..92e4226 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
[...]
> -static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
> +unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO;
>
> static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
> {
You're missing the code to parse "auto" here.
I also have this patch from a previous email:
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index d8362cf..10fd2d7 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -258,6 +258,25 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
to assume that this machine's pmtimer latches its value
and always returns good values.
+ acpi_enforce_resources= [ACPI]
+ { strict, auto, lax, no }
+ Check for resource conflicts between native drivers
+ and ACPI OperationRegions (SystemIO and SystemMemory
+ only). IO ports and memory declared in ACPI might be
+ used by the ACPI subsystem in arbitrary AML code and
+ can interfere with legacy drivers.
+ strict: access to resources claimed by ACPI is denied;
+ legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
+ will fail to load.
+ auto (default): try and detect ACPI devices with known
+ ACPI drivers; escalates the setting to "strict" if such
+ a device is found, otherwise behaves like "lax".
+ lax: access to resources claimed by ACPI is allowed;
+ legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
+ will load and a warning message is logged.
+ no: ACPI OperationRegions are not marked as reserved,
+ no further checks are performed.
+
agp= [AGP]
{ off | try_unsupported }
off: disable AGP support
Luca
--
"L'amore consiste nell'essere cretini insieme." -- P. Valery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
