Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

That said, I also wonder if we really even need to autoprobe the interrupts on any modern hardware. Rather than trying to speed up irq probing, maybe we could figure it out some other way..

You'll hate that suggestion, but i8250_pnp should already discover
it fine via ACPI on modern systems. ia64 has done it this way forever.
It probably won't work on really old system, but one could always
use DMI year to distingush (not pretty, but works usually)

Well, we should be able to tell where we got the port information from, if it's somewhere expected to be reliable like PCI configuration, ISAPnP or PnPACPI, or whether we're just probing magical ports and hoping to find something.

The only cases on x86 hardware where I would think probing would have to happen would be where the machine was too old to do either ISA Plug & Play or PnPACPI, or if you added in a non-PnP ISA modem or serial card.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux