On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:59:00PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 01:55 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > The ACPI code currently carries its own thermal trip handling, meaning that > > any other thermal implementation will need to reimplement it. Move the code > > to the generic thermal layer. > > > Are these ACPI stuffs generic enough to be ported to the generic thermal > driver? > e.g. the tc1, tc2, tsp, they are mentioned in the ACPI spec, > so my question is if the thermal zones than ACPI still have these > concepts? They're needed if you want to implement any sort of sensible implementation of passive cooling. They might not be expressed in quite the same way, but the basic concept is identical. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html