Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 07:45:14PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
You would laugh, this is due to Windows userspace debug library -- it
checks for
memory leaks by default, and it takes ages to do this.
And ACPICA maintainer is sitting on Windows, so he _cares_.
So what about getting a non-moronic maintainer instead? Really this
whole ACPI code is a piece of turd exactly because of shit like this.
Can't Intel get their act together and do a proper ACPI implementation
for Linux instead of this junk?
Or at least stop arguing and throwing bureaucratic stones in the way of
those wanting to sort out this mess.
Christoph, please, I don't work for Intel :)
How long will it take for _you_ to write another ACPICA ?
I assume it will be shining diamond?
Regards,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
