On Friday 01 August 2008 09:37:55 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> @@ -1013,7 +983,7 @@ static void acpi_device_set_id(struct acpi_device *device,
> will get autoloaded and the device might still match
> against another driver.
> */
> - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_video_bus_match(device)))
> + if (acpi_is_video_device(device))
> cid_add = ACPI_VIDEO_HID;
> else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bay_match(device)))
> cid_add = ACPI_BAY_HID;
It doesn't seem right to me to make this core behavior depend
on a config option. With this approach, the ACPI device tree may
or may not contain an ACPI_VIDEO_HID device, depending on whether
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO is set, and that seems capricious.
What is the benefit of moving this code out of scan.c? It's not
a very big function, and I think the consistency is worth the extra
code.
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO_MODULE)
> +
> +extern long acpi_video_get_capabilities(acpi_handle graphics_dev_handle);
> +extern long acpi_is_video_device(struct acpi_device *device);
> +extern int acpi_video_backlight_support(void);
> +extern int acpi_video_display_switch_support(void);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline long acpi_video_get_capabilities(acpi_handle graphics_dev_handle)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline long acpi_is_video_device(struct acpi_device *device)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
