On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 01:56:30PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > or something. Microsoft appear to have moved away from using date > > cutoffs for anything other than whether or not to enable ACPI in the > > first place, and we ought to attempt compatibility with them. > > okay, that's fine to me too. My main point is that we need something > nuanced this time around (be it a string check or a cutoff) - not the > "enable again" patch that i saw in the ACPI tree and which i had to > NAK. All we need now is confirmation as to which versions of Windows use this behaviour. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
