Sujith,
AFAICS, this patch is already applied.
since the e-mail is line-wrapped, it is tedious to verify,
let me know if i'm wrong.
thanks,
-Len
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
> 4th parameter of acpi_evaluate_integer changed to unsigned long long
> acpi_driver_data() changed to inline function from macro
>
> Signed-off-by: Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.27/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27.orig/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> +++ linux-2.6.27/drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int memory_get_int_max_bandwidth(
> {
> struct acpi_device *device = cdev->devdata;
> acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> - unsigned long value;
> + unsigned long long value;
> struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
> union acpi_object arg;
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int memory_get_cur_bandwidth(stru
> {
> struct acpi_device *device = cdev->devdata;
> acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> - unsigned long value;
> + unsigned long long value;
> struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
> union acpi_object arg;
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int memory_get_cur_bandwidth(stru
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "%ld\n", value);
> + return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value);
> }
>
> static int memory_set_cur_bandwidth(struct thermal_cooling_device
> *cdev,
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int memory_set_cur_bandwidth(stru
>
> status =
> acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, MEMORY_SET_BANDWIDTH,
> &arg_list,
> - (unsigned long *)&temp);
> + (unsigned long long *)&temp);
>
> printk(KERN_INFO
> "Bandwidth value was %d: status is %d\n", state, status);
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int intel_menlow_memory_add(struc
> goto end;
> }
>
> - acpi_driver_data(device) = cdev;
> + device->driver_data = cdev;
> result = sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj,
> &cdev->device.kobj, "thermal_cooling");
> if (result)
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int sensor_get_auxtrip(acpi_handl
> return -EINVAL;
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, index ? GET_AUX1 :
> GET_AUX0,
> - NULL, (unsigned long *)value);
> + NULL, (unsigned long long
> *)value);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EIO;
>
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int sensor_set_auxtrip(acpi_handl
> return -EINVAL;
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, index ? GET_AUX0 :
> GET_AUX1,
> - NULL, (unsigned long *)&temp);
> + NULL, (unsigned long long
> *)&temp);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EIO;
> if ((index && value < temp) || (!index && value > temp))
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int sensor_set_auxtrip(acpi_handl
>
> arg.integer.value = value;
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, index ? SET_AUX1 :
> SET_AUX0,
> - &args, (unsigned long *)&temp);
> + &args, (unsigned long long
> *)&temp);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EIO;
>
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static ssize_t bios_enabled_show(struct
> struct device_attribute *attr, char
> *buf)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> - unsigned long bios_enabled;
> + unsigned long long bios_enabled;
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(NULL, BIOS_ENABLED, NULL,
> &bios_enabled);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int __init intel_menlow_module_in
> {
> int result = -ENODEV;
> acpi_status status;
> - unsigned long enable;
> + unsigned long long enable;
>
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return result;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
