Re: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: revert msleep patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



applied to acpi-test

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:

> With the better solution for EC interrupt storm issue,
> there is no need to use msleep over udelay.
> 
> References:
> 	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
> 	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/ec.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index ef42316..3ef5b79 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ static int ec_check_sci(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 state)
>  static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  {
>  	unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY);
> -	msleep(1);
> +	udelay(ACPI_EC_UDELAY);
>  	while (time_before(jiffies, delay)) {
>  		gpe_transaction(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
> -		msleep(1);
> +		udelay(ACPI_EC_UDELAY);
>  		if (ec_transaction_done(ec))
>  			return 0;
>  	}
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux