Re: [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 2008-10-06 22:46:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > I promised at the KS that I would simplify the new suspend/hibernation
> > framework for devices to avoid the confusion with two types of PM
> > operations and pointers to PM operations from too many places.
> > 
> > The appended patch is intended for this purpose.  Unfortunately, I can't
> > split it into subsystem-related patches, because compilation would be broken
> > between them.
> > 
> > The patch applies to linux-next, but it's trivial to make it apply to the
> > mainline.  It's been compiled on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and tested
> > on hp nx6325, doesn't appear to break anything.
> 
> This one had a checkpatch.pl problem, sorry for that.  Updated patch is
> appended.

Seems ok to me. ACK.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux