On Tuesday 30 September 2008 12:13:58 Carlos Corbacho wrote: > On Tuesday 30 September 2008 12:06:35 Duarte Silva wrote: > > I wanted to propose a ACPI-WMI API change. Instead of having, > > wmi_has_guid returning a boolean, why not returning a acpi_status. It > > would allow extented error handling, and it would look more ACPI style :) > > NAK. > > We're not interested in ACPI error codes here, since we're never going to > do anything with them. > > We only care if the DSDT exists or not with this method - it's just a means > of detection for other drivers. s/DSDT/GUID/ -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
