Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
acpi_ps_parse_aml() is called not so often (~10000usec), so maybe it is
a "sweet spot"
The latency is pretty bad with this patch (assuming you did not want it
applied on top of your previous patch)
Here's the tail end of a full trace:
http://sucs.org/~sits/test/eeepc-debug/20080925/1250/latency_trace_all_tail.gz
(3.3Mbytes but close 100Mbytes when decompressed)
latency: 2912285 us, #1000038/5344107, CPU#0 | (M:desktop VP:0, KP:0,
SP:0 HP:0
)
Here's a complete (but filtered) trace:
http://sucs.org/~sits/test/eeepc-debug/20080925/1250/latency_trace.gz
latency: 315814 us, #227600/227600, CPU#0 | (M:desktop VP:0, KP:0,
SP:0 HP:0)
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
