On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:07 +0800, Zhao Yakui wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:17 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > > Fill in command unit of transaction_data structure, otherwise > > gpe_transaction will skip read or write instruction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <kexin.hao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > > index bd3555c..0c65e82 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > > @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command, > > } > > atomic_set(&ec->irq_count, 0); > > /* fill in transaction structure */ > > + ec->t.command = command; > It is also OK to add this explicitly. In fact the ec->t.command will be > assigned in the function of acpi_ec_write_cmd. NO, I am using the latest linux-next kernel and I don't found ec->t.command is assigned in acpi_ec_write_cmd function. Thanks, Kevin > > Thanks. > > ec->t.wdata = wdata; > > ec->t.wlen = wdata_len; > > ec->t.rdata = rdata; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
