Re: patch for bugs 9998 and 10724

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zhao Yakui wrote:
Hi, Alexey
    You attached the updated patch on the bug 10724/9998.
    Can the following situation be handled by your patch?(For example:
bug 10724)
       EC GPE Interrupt storm is detected and EC GPE will be disabled
when doing EC transaction.
       If EC notification event happens while doing EC transaction(EC
GPE is disabled), the SCI_EVT bit of EC status register is cleared
automatically before we can handle it.
SCI_EVT is cleared only as a response to query command sent to EC, there is no timeout on it. Transaction will take at most 2 ms (1 write/1 read or 2 writes in poll mode), and at the end of the transaction there is a check of the SCI bit.
With the un-patched EC SCI bit needs to stay for period while the QUERY_PENDING bit is set,
which could be quite more than 2 ms, and it seems to comply with that even on most broken
hardware.
       Can the EC notification event be handled by OS?
What do you mean?

 Thanks
     Yakui.
Please strip unneeded tails from your mails.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux