On Wed 03. Sep - 18:28:27, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > (Holger dropped from CC/To as requested by the mail-followup-to header). > > On Wed, 03 Sep 2008, Holger Macht wrote: > > On Mon 01. Sep - 12:05:04, Steven King wrote: > > > On Monday 01 September 2008 5:16:44 Tomas Carnecky wrote: > > > > > > > I just tested suspend/resume with the CDROM drive removed (an empty > > > > bay). Suspend/resume now works just fine, regardless how I dock/undock > > > > the laptop. > > > > > > I'm seeing the exact same things as Tom. Also, in my dmesg I see: > > > > > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay > > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler > > > ACPI: Error installing bay notify handler > > > > > > is this significant? > > > > No, it's not. Bay driver is obsolete with 2.6.26's libata hotplug code. > > Hardly so. We need to be able to query state and command the bay from > userspace. We need to support non-libata devices. We don't need, but want, > notifications that can be easily flagged by userspace as being related to > bay/dock ejections and insertions (for OSD). > > What makes bay obsolete is the rework on the dock driver that adds all bay > functionality to dock.c... and that ain't even on 2.6.27, AFAIK. Maybe the statement was a little bit harsh, it's just that you won't need bay in conjunction with libata, because it can't install the notification handler because that was already done by libata. Regards, Holger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
