>> Yakui, Did you actually check if the above was true? > Yes. There is no definition of _PSS,_PCT,_PPC in DSDT table, which are > required by acpi_cpufreq driver.At the same time there is no extra SSDT > table. So what's the significance of "no extra SSDT table"? Does that mean that XP and Linux are using the same tables to check for freq scaling support? > The driver is P4-clockmod, which is located in the directory of > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq Thanks. I just looked at the kernel.org kernel (what's the term used in lkml for this?) and found out the switch. I got the kernel.org kernel compiled with the .config used for the F9 kernel. Now I need figure out how to get it to boot. Btw, on your suggestion, I opened a bug for this issue. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11299 Does the LKML community consider the Fedora 9 kernels as too different? I would prefer using the F9 kernel for testing this issue since it's easier for me to compile and install. I got some important stuff to deal with for the next couple of days. So I will get back on this thread in 2-4 days. Thanks, SK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
