Re: Debug interface used for error message cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 01 August 2008 03:42:24 Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 17:59 +0800, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 22:29:19 Moore, Robert wrote:
> > > I'm going to go ahead and remove these from ACPICA.
> > >
> > > We added an "obsolete" warning in the header file some time ago, and
> >
> > I
> >
> > > think the time has come to remove them, especially in light of these
> > > patches to Linux.
> >
> > Great thanks.
> > If you are at that, do you think it makes sense to intruduce a GPE
> > bit?
> > Just leaving it unused for now?
> >
> >
> > I didn't play with these much yet, Rui, do you think this makes sense?
> > The
> > fact there were several sever problems recently and GPEs possibly
> > must get debugged by people writting other device drivers who do not
> > know
> > and do not want to know about the output of the other debug flags I
> > thought
> > this could make sense.
>
> We used to get the GPE debug info by doing this,
> set debug_layer=0x44, debug_level=0x8800001f
> We can get the content of GPE Block Register once a GPE is fired.
> and it's the same for PM1 Event Register and Fixed Events.
> Is this what you want?
Ahh yes:
ACPI_LV_INTERRUPTS              0x08000000
ACPI_LV_EVENTS                  0x80000000

I think this is what I am looking for.
Thanks,

        Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux