Re: Please pull ACPI updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> 
> Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi 
> preserved the changesets).

Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM.

I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a 
pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling 
from Andi was such a let-down in comparison.

But I decided to let it slide, because quite frankly, Len had done better 
than the average bear, and I didn't realize that the commits Andi had 
rebased had actually been in Len's tree in the _good_ format.

It seems I was wrong - I should _not_ have let it slide, and it appears 
that Andi had actually destroyed Len's pretty tree.

Andi. This can _not_ continue. You need to learn how to use topic 
branches, and how to not screw up other peoples trees. Otherwise I'll just 
have to stop pulling from you. AGAIN.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux