On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:10:31AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I'd still have a preference for not including the proc_generate_event > stuff, but I'm not sure that there's any real consensus on that so I'm > not going to block it. > > Acked-by: mjg@xxxxxxxxxx so how do we proceed from here? I've already asked for its inclusion but have not heard any statement from the ACPI maintainer[s]. Should I re-submit it to some other e-mail address? Or are there still issues that I should address? -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
