Hi Andi, On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:56:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:48:49 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The trees for the next ACPI merge are at git.kernel.org now > > These are based on Len's branches with some additional patches. > > > > (based on Linus' tree aka 2.6.26rc9) > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-acpi-2.6.git release > > Intended for the 2.6.27 merge > > If that is true .. > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/linux/kernel/ak/linux-acpi-2.6.git test > > Then why is linux-next tracking that? So maybe I read that wrong. It appears that the release branch is already a subset Linus' tree and you meant that comment ("Intended for the 2.6.27 merge") was meant to apply to the test branch. Right? > > (based on Linux next for patches with dependencies) > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-next-acpi.git > > Is there something we can do about those dependencies? This is still a valid question as I have been trying to push trivial dependencies into Linus' tree ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp8JWVuNe1YJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature